Posted by: pnr in Untagged on
Aug 25, 2009
Exchange servers are often heavy sized servers and they like and use all the CPU en Memory they get :-)... so is it a good idea to virtualize Exchange servers? Because virtualization of Exchange servers rarely results in a reduction of e.g. physical processors I was looking for other reasons. And I found one!
Posted by: hbr in Untagged on
Aug 21, 2009
I've been working with Windows 7 since the first beta was released and since that first beta, it's been working much better than Vista ever did on my laptop.
Posted by: pnr in Untagged on
Aug 20, 2009
Posted by: hbr in Untagged on
Aug 19, 2009
There is so much information that comes by that I sometimes hear of things, recognize that I heard something about that before, but totally forgot where.
Posted by: pst in Untagged on
Aug 19, 2009
Active Directory informatie toevoegen met MS Excel en Powershell
Uiteindelijk is de Active Directory een grote database met informatie waarin veel opgeslagen kan worden. Elke beheerder heeft de velden gezien om NAW gegevens van de gebruikers in te voeren, maar vaak worden deze niet gebruikt. Wie gaat dit immers beheren?
Posted by: pnr in Untagged on
Jul 31, 2009
VMware published a whitepaper about an I/O performance test for Exchange 2007 . What should be better: fibre, iSCSI or NFS?